23 April-10 May 2007 (NEW!!!)

▶ The test was made on 23 April-10 May 2007, using Windows XP Professional SP2 on a P4 3000 Mhz, 1024MB DDRAM.
▶ All programs tested had the latest versions, upgrades and updates and they were tested using their full scanning capabilities e.g. heuristics, full scan etc.
▶ The default settings of each program were not used, in order for each program to achieve its maximum detection rate. Because of this, there is a possibility for the tested programs to detect a few false positives.
▶ All programs were updated on 22 April 2007, between 10.00AM and 13.00PM GMT.
▶ The 174770 virus samples were chosen using VS2000 according to Kaspersky, F-Prot, Nod32, Dr.Web, BitDefender and McAfee antivirus programs. Each virus sample was unique by virus name, meaning that AT LEAST 1 antivirus program detected it as a new virus.
▶ ALL virus samples were unpacked and the only samples that were kept were the ones that were packed using external-dos-packers (that means not winzip, winrar, winace etc).
▶ The virus samples had the correct file extension using a special program (Renexts) and were unique, according to checksum32 filesize.
▶ Most "fake" virus samples were removed, as well as "garbage" files.
▶ The programs MKS_VIR , PER and IPArmor were not tested because there was no english demo version available.
▶ The programs Anti-Hacker Expert , Command , Extendia AVK , GDATA AVK , BOClean , UNA , VET and Freedom were not tested because there was no demo version available.
▶ Thorough mode was not used in VBA32 due to extremely slow scan process.
A-Squared Anti-Malware and eTrust PestPatrol are anti-trojan/anti-spyware programs, not antivirus programs
▶ F-Prot was tested using its command line scanner (options /adware /applications /report /streams /maxdepth=4 /heurlevel=4) because its GUI kept crashing.
▶ Windows Live OneCare, BKAV, PC Tools kept crashing while scanning the samples.
TheShield uses the exact same engine as VirobotExpert.
▶ Avira uses the exact same engine as AntiVir.
▶ Fire uses the exact same engine as Solo.
▶ MKS_VIR uses the exact same engine as ArcaVir.
▶ VirusBuster uses the exact same engine as Vexira.
▶ BullGuard uses the exact same engine as BitDefender free edition.
▶ Avast Professional uses the exact same engine as Avast free edition.
▶ AVG Anti-Malware uses the exact same engine as AVG Antivirus free edition plus the ▶ Ewido scan engine, so it has better detection than AVG Antivirus free edition.
▶ A-squared Anti-Malware Professional uses the exact same engine as A-squared free edition.
▶ InVircible did not include a "typical" scanner-function and could not be tested.
▶ V-Catch checks only mail accounts and could not be tested.
▶ DOS-Based scanners were not tested.
▶ The following file types were used.

SH, ELF, COM, EXE, PL, BAT, PRC, DOC, XLS, BIN, MDB, IMG, PPT, VBS, MSG, VBA, OLE, HTM, INI, SMM, TD0, REG, CLASS, HTA, JS, VI_, URL, PHP, WMF, HLP, XML, SCR, PIF, SHS, WBT, CSC, MAC, DAT, CLS, STI, INF, HQX, XMI, SIT.

The virus samples were divided into these categories, according to the type of the virus :

File = BeOS, FreeBSD, Linux, Mac, Palm, OS2, Unix, BinaryImage, BAS viruses, MenuetOS.
MS-DOS = MS-DOS viruses.
Windows = Win.*.* viruses.
Macro = Macro, Multi and Formula viruses.
Malware = Adware, DoS, Constructors, Exploit, Flooders, Nukers, Sniffers, SpamTools, Spoofers, Virus Construction Tools, Droppers, PolyEngines.
Script = ABAP, BAT, Corel, HTML, Java, Scripts, MSH, VBS, WBS, Worms, PHP, Perl, Ruby viruses.
Trojans-Backdoors = Trojan and Backdoor viruses.

**************** Rank ****************
(빨간색 Percentage는 바이러스 진단률입니다.)


1. Kaspersky version 7.0.0.43 beta - 99.23%
2. Kaspersky version 6.0.2.614 - 99.13%
3. Active Virus Shield by AOL version 6.0.0.308 - 99.13%
4. ZoneAlarm with KAV Antivirus version 7.0.337.000 - 99.13%
5. F-Secure 2007 version 7.01.128 - 98.56%
6. BitDefender Professional version 10 - 97.70%
7. BullGuard version 7.0.0.23 - 96.59%
8. Ashampoo version 1.30 - 95.80%
9. AntiVir version 7.03.01.53 Classic - 95.08%
10. eScan version 8.0.671.1 - 94.43%
11. Nod32 version 2.70.32 - 94.00%
12. CyberScrub version 1.0 - 93.27%
13. Avast Professional version 4.7.986 - 92.82%
14. AVG Anti-Malware version 7.5.465 - 92.14%
15. F-Prot έκδοση 6.0.6.4 - 91.35%
16. McAfee Enterprise version 8.5.0i+AntiSpyware module - 90.65%
17. Panda 2007 version 2.01.00 - 90.06%
18. Norman version 5.90.37 - 88.47%
19. ArcaVir 2007 - 88.24%
20. McAfee version 11.0.213 - 86.13%
21. Norton Professional 2007 - 86.08%
22. Rising AV version 19.19.42 - 85.46%
23. Dr. Web version 4.33.2 - 85.09%
24. Trend Micro Internet Security 2007 version 15.00.1450 - 84.96%
25. Iolo version 1.1.8 - 83.35%
26. Virus Chaser version 5.0a - 79.51%
27. VBA32 version 3.11.4 - 77.66%
28. Sophos Sweep version 6.5.1 - 69.79%
29. ViRobot Expert version 5.0 - 69.53%
30. Antiy Ghostbusters version 5.2.1 - 65.95%
31. Zondex Guard version 5.4.2 - 63.79%
32. Vexira 2006 version 5.002.62 - 60.07%
33. V3 Internet Security version 2007.04.21.00 - 55.09%
34. Comodo version 2.0.12.47 beta - 53.94%
35. Comodo version 1.1.0.3 - 53.39%
36. A-Squared Anti-Malware version 2.1 - 52.69%
37. Ikarus version 5.19 - 50.56%
38. Digital Patrol version 5.00.37 - 49.80%
39. ClamWin version 0.90.1 - 47.95%
40. Quick Heal version 9.00 - 38.64%
41. Solo version 5.1 build 5.7.3 - 34.52%
42. Protector Plus version 8.0.A02 - 33.13%
43. PcClear version 1.0.4.3 - 27.14%
44. AntiTrojan Shield version 2.1.0.14 - 20.25%
45. PC Door Guard version 4.2.0.35- 19.95%
46. Trojan Hunter version 4.6.930 - 19.20%
47. VirIT version 6.1.75 - 18.78%
48. E-Trust PestPatrol version 8.0.0.6 - 11.80%
49. Trojan Remover version 6.6.0 - 10.44%
50. The Cleaner version 4.2.4319 - 7.26%
51. True Sword version 4.2 - 2.20%
52. Hacker Eliminator version 1.2 - 1.43%
53. Abacre version 1.4 - 0.00%

DETAILED TEST RESULTS (.rar compressed file)


이 테스트는 약 6~9개월에 한번씩 테스트합니다..
작년 8월 테스트때보다 샘플이 3만개이상이나 추가되었군요...
http://blog.naver.com/wany7980?Redirect=Log&logNo=100005632409
위에껀 2004년 당시 위 테스트가 국내 네티즌들에게 공개되면서 안철수연구소에 문의가 계속 있자 안철수연구소에서 공식답변을 한건데...
읽어보시면 참 재미있습니다 ^^;;  
top
  1. Favicon of http://hestory.org BlogIcon HE 2007.05.19 21:14 댓글주소 | 수정/삭제 | 댓글

    1~4위까지 전부 Kaspersky 엔진이군요.
    상위권 제품들은 KAV엔진이나 다중엔진 제품들이 대부분이네요.
    NOD32는 여전히 선전 중이군요.
    베타지만 ESS (Eset Smart Security) 제품이 없어서 조금 아쉽네요. ^^;

    • Favicon of https://www.minkyo.net BlogIcon Kazami 2007.05.21 00:19 신고 댓글주소 | 수정/삭제

      Kaspersky의 명성 익히 들어왔지만...이번 결과로 좀더 명확해졌죠...^^ ESS라니 처음 들어보는 백신인걸요^^;;;

  2. Favicon of http://rukxer.net/ BlogIcon Rukxer 2007.05.20 16:55 댓글주소 | 수정/삭제 | 댓글

    역시 안랩.
    이젠 그 이름만으로 불안하다.

    • Favicon of https://www.minkyo.net BlogIcon Kazami 2007.05.21 00:20 신고 댓글주소 | 수정/삭제

      음..그래도 50%이상의 진단률인걸~!!ㅋ
      그런데다가 수년째 내컴의 백신 역활을 해주는 고마운 존재~!!-ㅁ-ㅋㅋ

Write a comment